Oct 7, 2011 |NBS

RICS damp expert Stephen Boniface defines the commonly accepted definition of rising damp before both he and fellow guest, Jeff Howell, claim ‘true’ rising damp doesn’t exist.

Construction lecturer turned author, Howell, cites his years of research and experimentation as evidence. He also questions the need for DPCs and claims chemically-injected ones are a ‘complete waste of time’.

The programme concludes that while rising damp is at best exceedingly rare, dampness in homes is a serious problem. The BRE methodology for testing for damp is illustrated, as is a discussion about the most likely causes of damp.

Our latest articles

Designing sustainability into construction – proof over promises in sustainable construction

With tightening regulations and growing client demand, the construction industry is under increasing pressure to demonstrate measurable progress against carbon reduction targets. For specifiers, that means ensuring every product installed stands up to scrutiny, not just in material, but in source, traceability, and lifetime carbon footprint. JELD-WEN, a specialist timber door, door kit and doorset manufacturer, explains the critical considerations when selecting sustainable materials.

Sponsored

Dulux Trade launches new solution for high-humidity spaces

Because of how they are used, kitchens and bathrooms experience more moisture, more contact, and more ongoing maintenance. Standard emulsions are not designed for this level of use. Over time, finishes can lose their appearance or fail to cope with the environment. Kitchens and bathrooms benefit best using a product formulated specifically for their daily demands.

Construction ProductsSponsored

The hidden cost of compliance: why architects are demanding a new era of product transparency

Few pieces of legislation have reshaped the UK construction industry as significantly as the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA). Introduced to improve accountability, traceability and safety standards across the built environment, the legislation has fundamentally changed the responsibilities placed on architects, contractors and manufacturers. While the principles behind the Act are widely supported, the reality for architectural practices is proving more challenging than many anticipated.