The 2013 edition of Approved Document M (AD M), which came into use on 6 April, does not introduce major changes in guidance, rather it addresses changes in other parts of Building Regulations and in other legislation, revises guidance on access statements and reflects changes in standards and other guidance. This article explores the main changes.
The Equality Act 2010 harmonized and strengthened the provisions of previous equalities legislation, including the now repealed Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) 1995. The Equality Act imposes a duty to make reasonable adjustments to a physical feature which might put a disabled person at a substantial disadvantage to a non-disabled person. That duty is similar, but not identical, to the DDA's test of a physical feature which made it unreasonably difficult or impossible for disabled people to use a building's facilities. There is still a ten-year exemption for features which complied with the version of AD M in force at the time of construction.
However, following the guidance in AD M will not necessarily be sufficient to comply with the Equality Act, as it may require adjustments which are outside the scope of AD M.
Access Statements were originally introduced to improve communication between applicants and building control bodies (BCBs), by explaining how the proposed building work was to meet the requirements of Part M. However, research carried out as part of the consultation on the Building Regulations revealed doubts about the usefulness of Access Statements, which were frequently perceived as being problematic for designers and unhelpful for BCBs.
As a result, AD M no longer requires the production of a written Access Statement, but recommends applicants engage with the BCB at the earliest possible stage, to communicate how the chosen approach is going to meet the accessibility needs of end users. Together they can agree an Access Strategy which identifies and addresses key risks and issues for the proposed building work, focusing on those areas where proposals diverge from the Approved Document.
On smaller works, it may be sufficient to have a conversation reviewing the proposals, which is then recorded by correspondence. Larger projects, particularly those involving complex work to existing buildings, are more likely to require a written document which sets out the key aspects of the design approach to accessibility, supported by annotated drawings, with face-to-face meetings to resolve key issues.
It remains the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate the solutions are appropriate.
One aim of the 2013 revision to the Building Regulations was to remove inconsistencies and overlapping guidance. To that end, Part N (Glazing) has been deleted and its requirements transferred to Part K (Protection from falling, collision and impact). The Approved Document to Part K (AD K) has been expanded and re-written following 'Plain English' principles. Guidance in AD M on matters covered by Part K (internal stairs and ramps, manifestation, vision panels and hazards on access routes) has been transferred to the new AD K. AD M now simply refers to the appropriate sections of AD K.
The main changes are:
There have been three other minor revisions to AD M:
The Approved Documents and guides are available to purchase in paper and online formats from www.ribabookshops.com