Oct 7, 2011 |NBS

RICS damp expert Stephen Boniface defines the commonly accepted definition of rising damp before both he and fellow guest, Jeff Howell, claim ‘true’ rising damp doesn’t exist.

Construction lecturer turned author, Howell, cites his years of research and experimentation as evidence. He also questions the need for DPCs and claims chemically-injected ones are a ‘complete waste of time’.

The programme concludes that while rising damp is at best exceedingly rare, dampness in homes is a serious problem. The BRE methodology for testing for damp is illustrated, as is a discussion about the most likely causes of damp.

Our latest articles

The hidden cost of compliance: why architects are demanding a new era of product transparency

Few pieces of legislation have reshaped the UK construction industry as significantly as the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA). Introduced to improve accountability, traceability and safety standards across the built environment, the legislation has fundamentally changed the responsibilities placed on architects, contractors and manufacturers. While the principles behind the Act are widely supported, the reality for architectural practices is proving more challenging than many anticipated.

Brick slip cladding systems – the need for robust specification

This article from the NBS technical team outlines specification for brick slip technology, including history, technology, design, safety and testing.

Design and SpecificationConstruction Products

Rethinking MMC: delivering speed without increasing risk

The need to build more homes, more quickly, has not changed. If anything, the pressure has intensified. However, the conversation around Modern Methods of Construction has evolved.