4 key points from the NBS National BIM Survey 2014

Jun 1, 2014 |NBS

In the UK, through BIM, we are at the forefront of a significant change in how buildings are conceived, designed, built and maintained. This change has the potential to bring improved efficiencies and profitability to the construction sector, and deliver better buildings to clients.

The following four points provide an insight into how BIM is used and perceived within the industry. You can download the full NBS National BIM Report 2014 download for free.

Awareness of BIM is near universal

It has risen from 58% in 2010 to 95% in 2013. Now only 5% of participants are unaware of BIM. Contrast this with 2010, when 43% of respondents had not heard of BIM. This rise may be because the Government has mandated use of BIM for publicly-funded projects by 2016, less than two years away. Awareness has increased, and so too has adoption.

 4bim01

The top five barriers to BIM adoption among smaller organizations

There is some commonality. For both smaller and larger organizations, cost is a barrier, with 67% of smaller organizations and 64% of larger ones citing it. A lack of in-house expertise is a barrier to both groups as well, with over three quarters of larger organizations mentioning it and 62% of smaller ones.

For smaller organizations, client demand is the highest barrier to BIM adoption. Whilst the Government enforces BIM for publicly-funded work, clients of smaller organizations don’t often make similar demands. 63% of small organizations tell us that the projects they work on are ‘too small’ to warrant BIM and 71% that BIM is ‘not relevant to the projects we work on’ – perhaps because the level of complexity just isn’t there to warrant BIM.

There is a risk here that we can describe in two ways: either that the Government, through its BIM strategy, is excluding smaller organizations from a significant source of revenue (publicly funded work), or that smaller organizations need to adopt BIM to prepare themselves for 2016 (as many are already doing).

In any case, if BIM is to become a tool for all designers, there is work to be done, not only by smaller practices but also by the wider industry.

02bim

Attitudes towards BIM: A comparison of those who use it and those who don’t

Only 4% wished that they hadn’t adopted BIM, whilst 21% of non-users would rather not adopt BIM. More importantly perhaps, 61% of users found that BIM brought cost efficiencies, 52% that it increased the speed of delivery and 45% agreed that it increased profitability (16% disagreed; the remainder, 39%, were neutral). Those who have adopted BIM predict that both clients and contractors will insist on the adoption of BIM. With unremitting pressure on architects’ and others’ professional fees, it looks as if BIM may offer a way to getting more work, and making that work more profitable.

For those who have adopted BIM, the data is unequivocal. The experience of those who have adopted BIM shows us that the process, whilst not easy, is worthwhile. It delivers a competitive advantage.

03bim
 

“BIM will not be successful until there is a robust standard for the exchange of BIM information.”

For collaboration to be successful, collaborating parties need to use agreed standards. Only 24% agreed that the current level of standardization is right, suggesting that the construction industry needs to implement a greater degree of standardization for BIM adoption to be successful.

04bim

With 36% using BS 1192:2007 and 27% using PAS 1192-2:2013, we can see that a significant number of respondents use standardized processes for the ownership, review and sign-off of information, before that information is more widely shared. This is crucial for larger projects and practices where information goes across and beyond the design team.

These findings were originally published as part of the NBS National BIM Report 2014 download which you can download for free.



Our latest articles

Visqueen launches Ultimate Self Adhesive Membrane for hydrocarbon and VOC-contaminated sites

The construction industry faces growing challenges when building on increasingly complex brownfield sites. Alongside the need for effective waterproofing, developers and contractors must now address a wider range of ground contaminants, including hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and hazardous ground gases, while maintaining programme efficiency and installation quality. Against this backdrop, Visqueen has expanded its gas protection and waterproofing portfolio with the launch of Visqueen Ultimate Self Adhesive Membrane, a new hydrocarbon and VOC-resistant self-adhesive tanking membrane. Developed as the latest addition to the Visqueen non-foil gas barrier range, the new membrane combines proven gas barrier and waterproofing performance to help specifiers address multiple site challenges with a single solution.

Construction ProductsSponsored

Siderise: Helping to bridge the gap between Gateway 2 approval and on-site fire protection

While the new building safety regime hasn’t fundamentally changed what requirements higher-risk buildings (HRBs) must meet to comply with the Building Regulations, it has significantly increased the breadth, depth and volume of evidence that must be supplied to demonstrate this. As a result, project teams have had to adapt the way they work and even look beyond their roles to understand how their actions may impact the next Dutyholder in the chain. For specifiers, this can include considering what supporting services are offered with life safety-critical elements to enable correct design, installation and maintenance. Early engagement with manufacturer technical specialists can help identify any practical challenges that may arise onsite. Then, during construction, these services can help support the translation of design intent into reality so that buildings are safe for occupation.

Construction ProductsSponsored

RIBA CPD for Architects: Understanding Flooring Specification and Detailing

For architects and specifiers, flooring details can have a significant impact on the safety, accessibility, durability and overall performance of a building. Yet the technical considerations surrounding stairways, floor transitions, and floor finishes are not always straightforward.

RIBA CPDSponsored