Design incorporating work at height

Oct 8, 2012 |NBS

When it comes to reducing the risk of falls from height, what responsibility do architects have to site operatives during the design/ construction phase and to those that will use and maintain the building post completion?

The programme is a studio-based interview with architect and CDM-co-ordinator Paul Bussey from Scott Brownrigg. Against the backdrop of the current Working at Height Regulations, Paul sets out the dangers and explains the delicate balance that architects must strike between giving clients what they want and ensuring that those constructing and maintaining the building do not face unreasonable levels of risk while carrying out their work.

Key learning points:

  • An overview of the WHRs
  • In terms of the risk of falling from height, what are the potential danger areas on site?
  • What are MEWPs and BMUs
  • Is roped access the least safe option when it comes to maintenance?
  • An introduction to The Lofstedt Review and the forthcoming BS 8560

About the contributor

Paul Bussey, Dip.Arch Hons RIBA RMaPs MIFireE, has 35 years experience in architecture. A degree in Architecture from Liverpool University was followed by three years in Zambia. After qualifying back in the UK, Paul spent 19 years with London practice RHWL.

Paul joined Scott Brownrigg in 2005. A registered CDM-C he currently chairs the architectural CDM designers group DIOHAS, with representation on the HSE's CONIAC Working Group evaluating the 2007 CDM Regulations, and other government led partnership groups.

He is also vice-chairman of the London Region and National Representative on the Council of the Association for Project Safety and also chairs a British Standards working group writing a new BS 8560 on Design for Working at Height.

RIBA CPDDisclaimer: NBS TV programmes are the intellectual property of RIBA Enterprises and it shall be a breach of this right to copy, or in any way exploit commercially or show in public any of the programmes without the express permission of RIBA Enterprises.
The information contained in the programmes is not intended and accordingly shall not be relied upon either as a substitute for professional advice or judgement or to provide legal or other advice with respect to any particular circumstance. RIBA Enterprises accepts no responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of the information contained in the programmes.
 

Our latest articles

The hidden cost of compliance: why architects are demanding a new era of product transparency

Few pieces of legislation have reshaped the UK construction industry as significantly as the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA). Introduced to improve accountability, traceability and safety standards across the built environment, the legislation has fundamentally changed the responsibilities placed on architects, contractors and manufacturers. While the principles behind the Act are widely supported, the reality for architectural practices is proving more challenging than many anticipated.

Brick slip cladding systems – the need for robust specification

This article from the NBS technical team outlines specification for brick slip technology, including history, technology, design, safety and testing.

Design and SpecificationConstruction Products

Rethinking MMC: delivering speed without increasing risk

The need to build more homes, more quickly, has not changed. If anything, the pressure has intensified. However, the conversation around Modern Methods of Construction has evolved.